schiavo
The Terri Schiavo case has been in the news for some time now - in fact, I remember reading about it a couple of years ago when Jeb Bush stepped in to intercede on Schiavo’s parents’ behalf. Now she’s died after having her feeding tube removed 13 days ago.
I find it astonishing that this legal battle for a person’s life went on for 15 years. Terri Schiavo was in what the doctors described as a ‘persistent vegetative state’ all that time. There are some - i.e. her parents - that say that she should have been given every chance to recover, even if that meant maintaining the feeding tube for the rest of her natural life. Her ex-husband, on the other hand, felt it was more humane to let her die, stating that he didn’t believe Terri would have wanted to live that way. I actually agree with the ex-husband. Terri’s parents talked about getting smiles and other signs of life out of her; but ‘life’ is very different to ‘quality of life’, and I don’t think Terri Schiavo had any of the latter.
What I don’t agree with, however, is the way in which Terri Schiavo died. Her feeding tube was removed, and she slowly starved to death over a period of a little under two weeks. Whether she was consciously aware or in pain or not, starving someone to death is horribly inhumane.
Euthanasia is still a huge moral dilemma. Ultimately, I believe if there’s no quality of life, death by choice should be an option - but not slowly and drawn out.




